Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Scandal results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 2,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,711 of 16,562 topics). This Epstein Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Epstein Scandal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.4%23.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos