Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epic Games results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Special Pleading, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 463 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,545 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,210 of 16,562 topics). This Epic Games is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Epic Games
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,545
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.8%2.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos