Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Entitlement Reform results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 3,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,714 of 16,562 topics). This Entitlement Reform is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Entitlement Reform
Topic details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos