Topic summary
⁠61%3 analyzed articles/videos4,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Transition results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,172 hits. Analysis detected 14,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,721 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,598 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Transition is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Energy Transition
Topic details
Total words: 14,721
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.6%14.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos