Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Supply results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,237 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Supply is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Energy Supply
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos