Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Grid results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 4,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,628 of 15,753 topics). This Energy Grid is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Energy Grid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.0%17.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos