Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Costs results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,695 hits. Analysis detected 16,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,708 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,670 of 16,559 topics). This Energy Costs is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Energy Costs
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos