Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alba Cuebas-Fantauzzi results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 2,095 hits . Analysis detected 20,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,265 of 6,364 authors). This Alba Cuebas-Fantauzzi is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Alba Cuebas-Fantauzzi
Author details
Total words: 13,236
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst