Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Energy Conservation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,526 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Energy Conservation
Topic details
Total words: 2,526
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos