Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy & Utilities results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 1,147 hits. Analysis detected 4,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,509 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,250 of 16,562 topics). This Energy & Utilities is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Energy & Utilities
Topic details
Total words: 3,509
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.7%32.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos