Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endometriosis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,287 of 16,562 topics). This Endometriosis is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Endometriosis
Topic details
Total words: 5,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst