Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimberly Drake results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,440 of 6,628 authors). This Kimberly Drake is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Kimberly Drake
Author details
Total words: 5,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst