Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Employment Data results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (7,029 of 15,755 topics). This Employment Data is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Employment Data
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos