Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Employee Compensation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 669 hits . Analysis detected 3,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Employee Compensation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Employee Compensation
Topic details
Total words: 3,088
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst