Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emiliano Martinez results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 888 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Emiliano Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emiliano Martinez
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Emiliano Martinez (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.1%26.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.3%17.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos