Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Security results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 547 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,665 of 15,447 topics). This Emergency Security is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Emergency Security
Topic details
Total words: 1,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos