Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Medical Services results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (10,076 of 16,562 topics). This Emergency Medical Services is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Emergency Medical Services
Topic details
Total words: 3,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos