Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Cohen results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 350 hits . Analysis detected 2,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,496 of 6,628 authors). This Rachel Cohen is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Rachel Cohen
Author details
Total words: 3,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst