Topic summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Alert Systems results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 973 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,168 of 16,562 topics). This Emergency Alert Systems is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Emergency Alert Systems
Topic details
Total words: 1,317
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst