Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emerald Fennell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 1,510 hits. Analysis detected 7,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,363 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (2,611 of 16,559 topics). This Emerald Fennell is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Emerald Fennell
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 85%Emerald Fennell (selected)7%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,363
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 34.9%34.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 44.9%44.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.4%22.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 44.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos