Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embezzlement results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 1,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,161 of 16,562 topics). This Embezzlement is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Embezzlement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.6%24.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos