Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Email Security results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,448 of 15,988 topics). This Email Security is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Email Security
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠41%Email Security (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos