Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Email results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,898 of 16,562 topics). This Email is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Email
Topic details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst