Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Elon Musk's Wealth results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 3,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,785 topics). This Elon Musk's Wealth is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Elon Musk's Wealth
Topic details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos