Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Elon Musk's Net Worth results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,399 topics). This Elon Musk's Net Worth is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Elon Musk's Net Worth
Topic details
Total words: 2,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos