Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eli Lilly results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 187 hits . Analysis detected 1,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,284 of 16,562 topics). This Eli Lilly is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Eli Lilly
Topic details
Total words: 616
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.3% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles616 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.4% 30.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 18.8% 18.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 14.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst