Topic summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electromagnetism results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Begging the Question , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 2,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,178 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,493 of 15,689 topics). This Electromagnetism is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Electromagnetism
Topic details
Total words: 2,178
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Composition/Division: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst