Topic summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electricity Generation results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 405 hits . Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,518 of 16,562 topics). This Electricity Generation is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Electricity Generation
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst