Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electric Bicycles results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 966 hits. Analysis detected 5,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,283 of 16,562 topics). This Electric Bicycles is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Electric Bicycles
Topic details
Total words: 5,378
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos