Author summary
59%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Thornton results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 3,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,564 of 6,400 authors). This Paul Thornton is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Paul Thornton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Paul Thornton (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos