Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Trends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 5,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,599 of 16,562 topics). This Electoral Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Electoral Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.5%17.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos