Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Reform results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 705 hits. Analysis detected 4,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,055 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,293 of 16,226 topics). This Electoral Reform is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Electoral Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,055
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos