Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos1,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Strategy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,165 hits. Analysis detected 6,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,982 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,754 of 16,562 topics). This Election Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Election Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 10,982
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos