Topic summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Scandals results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,765 hits. Analysis detected 11,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,501 of 16,562 topics). This Election Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Election Scandals
Topic details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.0%24.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.5%27.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos