Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John F. Di Leo results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 1,269 hits . Analysis detected 8,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,105 of 6,355 authors). This John F. Di Leo is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. John F. Di Leo
Author details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.7% 18.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.4% 17.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.1% 26.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst