Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John F. Di Leo results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 1,269 hits. Analysis detected 8,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,105 of 6,355 authors). This John F. Di Leo is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
John F. Di Leo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%John F. Di Leo (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.7%18.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.4%17.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 26.1%26.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos