Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Issues results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 22,879 topics). This Election Issues is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Election Issues
Topic details
Total words: 3,693
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst