Topic summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Analysis results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 1,703 hits . Analysis detected 13,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,754 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,031 of 15,753 topics). This Election Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Election Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 6,754
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 23.3% 23.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 25.2% 25.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst