Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Chao results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 2,112 hits. Analysis detected 7,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,758 of 15,447 topics). This Elaine Chao is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Elaine Chao
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.6%33.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos