Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These El Salvador History results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 936 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,062 of 16,562 topics). This El Salvador History is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
El Salvador History
Topic details
Total words: 1,395
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos