Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos2,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Educational Standards results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,190 hits. Analysis detected 8,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (14,751 of 23,197 topics). This Educational Standards is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Educational Standards
Topic details
Total words: 9,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos