Author summary
ā 100% 1 analyzed article/video 696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacy Washington results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Straw Man , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 1,151 hits . Analysis detected 6,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (856 of 9,037 authors). This Stacy Washington is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Stacy Washington
Author details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 41.3% 41.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 15.6% 15.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 41.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.9%, sitewide 8.1% Straw Man: Author 16.8%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 15.6%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst