Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Educational Equity results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,555 topics). This Educational Equity is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Educational Equity
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Educational Equity (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos