Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Education Spending results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 2,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,143 of 16,562 topics). This Education Spending is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Education Spending
Topic details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.4%10.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.8%5.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos