Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Education Finance results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,195 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,762 of 16,562 topics). This Education Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Education Finance
Topic details
Total words: 3,195
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos