Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edtech results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 486 faulty-reasoning hits from 249 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (182 of 16,562 topics). This Edtech is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Edtech
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 249
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
21.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles249 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 39.0%39.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 28.5%28.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.7%19.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.7%23.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.3%27.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.8%37.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 28.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos