Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos3,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ecuador results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,899 hits. Analysis detected 9,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,545 of 16,562 topics). This Ecuador is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Ecuador
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos