Topic summary
98% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Warfare results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,892 hits . Analysis detected 17,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,625 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,078 of 15,769 topics). This Economic Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Economic Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 8,625
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 4.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst