Topic summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos2,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Theory results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,420 hits. Analysis detected 9,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,022 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,791 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Theory is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Economic Theory
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,022
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos