Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Stimulus results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 641 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,424 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Stimulus is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Economic Stimulus
Topic details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 3.2%3.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos