Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Economic Security & Mobility results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 554 hits. Analysis detected 4,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,832 topics). This Economic Security & Mobility is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Economic Security & Mobility
Topic details
Total words: 5,811
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos